I'll take at least one 117 set in blue/grey, pretty please.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Making the most of the 63' DMU chassis
Collapse
X
-
Here's an idea to help spread the development costs a bit, how about doing the Class 117 in instalments? No, I am not going doolally, there really is a method in madness (and not the other way round).
To start with, tool up the DTS to go with the existing class 121 bubble cars. You can sell these to existing class 121 customers and it should be cheap to tool as it is just 1 new bodyshell and an unpowered chassis.
The good thing about the Class 121 DTS is that it actually gives you 2 elements that you can reuse in making a Class 117. The bodyshell of the DTS is exactly the same as the DMS from the Class 117.
Now all you need to add are the 2 remaining bodyshells to produce a Class 117 since you have the DMS bodyshell and the unpowered chassis from the Class 121 DTS, and the powered chassis from the class 121. I really think this is an excellent way of killing 2 birds with one stone.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Matt Pinto View PostHere's an idea to help spread the development costs a bit, how about doing the Class 117 in instalments? No, I am not going doolally, there really is a method in madness (and not the other way round).
To start with, tool up the DTS to go with the existing class 121 bubble cars. You can sell these to existing class 121 customers and it should be cheap to tool as it is just 1 new bodyshell and an unpowered chassis.
Sides to make the DTS
Ends to have cab or blind/corridor end.
Then produce first of all the 121 DMBS, with the 121 DTS following. The production of a 117 'power twin' would then be almost completely tooled (just a trailer chassis with engine mouldings would be needed) and be a bonus high value product from tooling (hopefully) paid for by the 121. Thereby the centre trailer could be produced later for those wanting to turn their 2 car 117 into a 3 car.
Thinking even more carefully there is little reason why the base tools might not also allow inserts to be made to produce other long frame units.
I don't know if Dapol did use this concept or progress so far down the line with the idea to maximise flexibility, as there would obviously be an increased initial cost.
However if you are producing 'just 1 new bodyshell and an unpowered chassis' there's not much you aren't making a new tool for, so it will not be a 'cheap tool' it will cost the same as every other tool does, as you are making an entire new coach, unless the costs can be apportioned to other potential products.
Unfortunately Bachmann have announced a 117 model in OO which will cause Dapol to consider carefully the viability of developing the dmu product line in that scale, which in turn impacts the costs which would have to be borne by the model in other scales.
Comment
-
Just want to add that I model two eras so will want 2x 117 DMUs in Green and 2x 117 DMUs in Banger Blue.
I'm sure these will be announced just after I have cut and shut a multitude of 121/122 bodies.
It IS possible (but not pretty) to make the centre coach from the remains of about three 121 bodies...
Oh and the idea of 121 trailer coaches is also a good idea
Best
Bob
Comment
-
I thought I would resurrect this thread as I’ve seen there’s been no more posts for over a year.
I just wondering if there were any more thoughts of Dapol giving us N Gaugers a larger suburban DMU? Class 116, 117 or 118.? Either would be more than welcome...
Cheers,
Mark
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment